syd
NYC
Mtl

Last Updated: Sun, Jul 26 2026
The full working agreement between Sydney Dramaturgical and its contributing writers.
Sydney Dramaturgical is an independent theatre publication. We commission paid reviews, interviews, and essays about live performance, and publish them at sydneydramaturgical.com. We're also a discovery platform and working archive for independent live performance in Sydney, New York, and Montréal. In odd years, we produce original theatre.
Your work sits inside a longer arc. Independent performances are temporary — a few nights, limited documentation, then gone. Our editorial project is to give those performances a life beyond their run: discoverability before and during the event, critical interpretation while they're culturally current, a searchable record afterward.
Your review, essay, or interview belongs to the third: memory. It becomes the trace that outlasts the performance. Someone researching this scene in five years, or fifty, will find your writing rather than the show itself. That's both a real responsibility and a real gift. It's also why we care about voice — the record is only worth keeping if it's written by someone with something to say.
Sydney Dramaturgical discovers, interprets and preserves live performance.
SDC works with two pools of writers:
Your tier is agreed at engagement and doesn't vary between assignments.
Reviews are funded two ways:
Both streams are published the same way, edited the same way, treated the same way.
Writers are not told which stream a review belongs to. When SDC briefs you on a show, the brief includes the title, venue, performance date, and any known content warnings. It doesn't disclose funding source, commissioner identity, or expectations. This double-blind is load-bearing — it protects writer independence and reader trust, and is non-negotiable.
Don't attempt to determine who commissioned any specific review, and don't speculate publicly about commissioning.
For interviews and essays, all pieces are editorially commissioned by SDC (or brought to us pre-written, in the case of essays) for now. Whether the requested-commission model will extend to those formats is not yet decided.
You write what you think of the show, artist, or subject. But at the end of the day, our subjects are fringe artists working with little resource and less coverage — SDC exists to support them, not to tear them down. The editor may adjust framing, tone, or language to keep the piece in that spirit.
The editor has final say. Substantive changes are discussed with you before publishing, and you're encouraged to push back respectfully on edits you disagree with — but if we can't agree, the editor's call stands.
Drafts are never shared with commissioners, producers, or anyone outside the editorial team before publication.
Editorial independence applies unless you accept an assignment with specific terms attached (e.g. a themed feature, a constrained format). Those terms would govern for that piece only.
Deadlines can flex if you stay in communication. Silence, not lateness, is the issue.
After publication, edits are only accepted for factual or sensitive details — not opinion, tone, or subjectivity. Sensitive details means anything that could compromise someone's safety, employment, or legal standing: naming a person who hasn't consented (a minor, an audience member, someone in the interviewee's private life), health or mental health information, sexuality, family circumstances, immigration status, and similar.
You don't use AI to generate the substantive content of your pieces.
Transcription (interviews): you may use AI-assisted transcription tools, but you're responsible for the accuracy of the final transcript. Uneditorialised AI transcripts — raw output pasted in without you having read, corrected, and refined it — are grounds for cancellation with no kill fee.
You're responsible for fact-checking your own work. SDC isn't an accuracy publication in the investigative-journalism sense — the context is fringe and independent performance, and this is understood on all sides.
Disclose conflicts at the moment of assignment, regardless of whether it came from a pitch or from SDC outreach. Prior work with anyone in the production (or the interviewee, or the essay subject), personal closeness, or any relationship that could reasonably compromise your independence must be flagged. SDC reassigns without penalty.
You're responsible for knowing what you're talking about before criticising a work. This is a values statement about the standard SDC expects, not an enforceable clause. You're also encouraged to write positive content, especially if you don't come from a theatre-making background.
You agree not to publicly disparage Sydney Dramaturgical, other SDC contributors, or the editorial process.
We're not too strict, but examples include:
Once a piece is agreed, no tasks are added after the fact. Any scope changes for future work are discussed and agreed in advance.
SDC will run anything. The publication values writing that risks something. SDC reserves the right to add a disclaimer to any article, at any point, stating that the views are the writer's own and not representative of Sydney Dramaturgical.
Available to both working critics and emerging writers.
Available to working critics only.
Get consent to record before the interview. Non-negotiable. Some jurisdictions (including Quebec) require consent from all parties on the recording. Confirm with your interviewee before you press record, and note their consent at the top of your recording.
Unlike some publications, SDC allows writers to check with interviewees before publication. Either you or the editor may share the interviewee's own quotes with them for accuracy — this isn't required, but it's fine to do, and often useful. We don't share the full piece, and we don't share editorial framing.
If the interviewee asks for substantive changes to a quote, work through it with them and let the editor know. The editor makes the final call on what runs.
If an interviewee says something is off the record, it's off the record. Don't include it in the piece, don't reference it obliquely, don't use it as background colour. This applies whether they say it before, during, or after the recorded conversation.
An embargo is when a source, publicist, or company shares information with an agreement that you won't publish it until a specific date or time. It's common in theatre — new-season announcements, casting news, some preview periods.
If an artist, publicist, or theatre company shares information with an embargo (e.g. "please don't publish about our next season until August 1"), honour it. When you agree to an interview, flag any embargoes to the editor so we can plan around them. If you're covering a preview period and the show has asked reviewers to hold until opening night, that's an embargo too — check with the show and the editor.
Available to working critics only.
SDC accepts essays in two ways:
SDC is run almost entirely by people with full-time jobs, university study, artistic practice, or other professional commitments. You may occasionally receive emails from us outside conventional business hours — this reflects when our editors are available to work, not an expectation that you should be. If your boundary is to read and respond only during your own working hours (9 to 5 or otherwise), we fully support that.
We ask for the same understanding in return. If a response takes a little longer than expected, another part of life has temporarily taken priority — not that your work has been forgotten.
We've invested in machine-assisted workflows so we can spend more time writing, editing, and thinking, and less time on bureaucracy. Some involve AI, most don't. Aubrey edits by hand and mistakes happen — you're welcome, encouraged even, to push back on edits. Respectfully.
Every human byline is written by a human, and every editorial decision is made by a human. If these practices are incompatible with yours, we respect that decision.